Writing
  
Meroitic
        
        Stela inscribed in the Meroitic script. 
        
            | 
         
       
 The earliest evidence found for the Meroitic writing 
                    dates back to the early second century BC.  One of the biggest misconceptions is that Meroitic was similar to the language of  classical Kush and Egypt. In  an extensive research on Meroitic,  two of the world's renouned experts of Meroitic, Claude Rilly and Alex de Voogt, conclude: 
                    
                    
                    
             
      "Whether cursive of hieroglyphic, the Meroitic script is not a system of consonants and ideographic signs as in Egyptian. Instead it is a syllabary with a default vowel /a/, also known for the Brahmi script in India, for instance"1 
                  
            Meroitic  is an alphasyllabic script,2 and is composed of twenty-three characters, four vowels, fifteen 
                  consonants, and four syllabus signs.3 In this system, every consonant has a presumed vowel. When writing consonants without vowels, the scribes used special signs.  
                  Both, the hieroglyphic and the cursive versions of Meroitic were read in 
                    the direction that the figures face. However, most of the 
                    cursive writings found were written from right to left, and the 
                    hieroglyphs from top to bottom. Words were uniquely separated 
                    by two or three dots. Examples of deciphered Meroitic words 
                  that are commonly found in Meroitic texts include qor for ruler, kdi for lady, ste for mother, and mk for god.4 
                 
                 
                 
            
      
      
      
                 
                
            Although the aspect of flexibility must have been a  major advantage to the efficiency of the Meroitic script, it leads to significant difficulties when linguists attempt to  decipher it. This is one reason  the decipherment of Merotic remains a challenge.
            The problem is magnified by the fact that the script was not included in the Rosetta Stone; there is no direct comparable script to Meroitic.  
            Perhaps the biggest  question about Meroitic concerns its classification. While some scholars theorize that it is  related to  Berber,5 and other Afro-Asiatic  languages, others suggest  Eastern Sudanic.6 Affiliations between  Meroitic and   the Indo-European language family on  one hand,7 and South Semitic on the other,8 are still debated by  linguists.  
                  Understanding Meroitic would be of immense value to our knowledge 
                    of the Kushite civilization. Unfortunately, the scholarly efforts 
                    aimed at deciphering the script are not enough. Unless 
                    deciphered, our knowledge of the Kushite kingdom and its people 
          will remain lacking.   |