Kingship
             Napatan and Meroitic 
            The Kushite statehood had survived for over a thousand years without being 
              subjigated by Egypt, the empired that ruled Egypt (e.g. 
              Persia and Rome), or the harassful desert nomads. This observation is noted as a strong 
              indicator for the efficiency of the Kushite state system. 
              
               
                    
                    Shabits of Kushite kings 
                    
                     
                        
                       | 
                     
                   
                  
                  
            
            The Napatan-Meroitic era is characterized by continuity in the 
              ruling system.
              
              The 
              Kushite pharaohs, then, were believed to have been god's representatives on earth. The  duty of the pharaohs was, therefore, to apply Ma'at, i.e. keeping order and 
              justice. Unlike the Egyptians, evidence shows that the Napatan 
              Pharaohs were not always succeeded by their direct sons but by other 
              family members such as brothers or the sons' of brothers. 
             Kush followed a specific procedure to select the particular in 
              time pharaoh from among other royal members. The selection procedure 
              was normally performed by high priests, who were expected to  
              consult the Cult of Amon over  the issue. The answer of Amon 
              to the priests, as to who should be the king, was considered final. 
              The selected pharaoh was then anointed at the temple of Amon at 
              Napata by the high priests. Then the new pharaoh visited the main 
              temples of Kush to get ordained and perform other religious rites related to 
              the coronation ceremony. 
                    
                    Temple relief of Kushite king Shabako offering libations to 
                    the gods. Source: Wildung, Dietrich. Sudan: Ancient Kingdoms 
                    of the Nile. 
                    
                     
                         
                       | 
                     
                   
             According to the writings of Greek and Roman geographers, if the high priests decided that the 
              pharaoh failed to rule according to Ma'at, they could issue an order 
              that required the pharaoh to commit suicide. According to the second century BC Greek writer Agatharcides 
              of Cnidus, Meroitic king Ergamenes 
              (also known as Arkamani-qo) ordered all the high priests to be slaughtered 
              because they sent him a letter with the order of suicide.1 Thus, unlike the Egyptian pharaohs, the Kushite pharaohs did not practice absolute 
              power.  
              Historical writings provide some statements on     attitudes of the Kushite rulers. For example,  Herodotus,  in the fourth 
              century BC, wrote the following about the  rule of the Kushite pharaoh Sabaco  in Egypt:  
              
              "In his reign the Ethiopians [Kushites]and Sabacos the king of the Ethiopians marched upon Egypt with a great host of men; so this blind man departed, flying to the fen-country, and the Ethiopian was king over Egypt for fifty years, during which he performed such deeds:– whenever 
              any Egyptian committed any transgression, he [Sabaco pharaoh 
              of Kush] would never put him to death, but he gave sentence 
              upon each man according to the greatness of his wrong doing, appointing 
              them to work at throwing embankment before that city whence each 
              man came committed wrong."(Herodotus ii. 137)2    
              
             
            
            Authored: 2004. 
            Edited: Dec. 2008. 
            
              Back 
            
              |